A. Program Design (25%)
Rating | Criteria |
---|---|
25 | Solution well thought out |
15 | Solution partially planned out |
05 | ad hoc solution; program "designed at the keyboard" |
B. Program Execution (20%)
Rating | Criteria |
---|---|
20 | Program runs correctly |
12 | Program produces correct output half of the time |
04 | Program runs, but mostly incorrectly |
0 | Program does not compile or run at all |
C. Specification Satisfaction (25%)
Rating | Criteria |
---|---|
25 | Program satisfies specification completely and correctly |
15 | Many parts of the specification not implemented |
05 | Program does not satisfy specification |
D. Coding Style (20%)
Rating | Criteria | |
---|---|---|
20 | Well-formatted, understandable code; appropriate use of language capabilities | |
12 | Code hard to follow in one reading; poor use of language capabilites | |
04 | Incomprehensive code, appropriate language capabilites not used |
E. Comments (10%)
Rating | Criteria |
---|---|
10 | Concise, meaningful, well- formatted comments |
06 | Partial, poorly written or poorly formatted comments |
04 | Wordy, unnecessary, incorrect, or badly formatted comments |
0 | No comments at all |
F. Extra Credit (10%) We will specify the Extra Credit portion (if there is any) in the assignment statement. Do not assume that every assignment will have an Extra Credit section.
Rating | Criteria |
---|---|
04 | Programs that usefully extend the requirements |
03 | Programs that use a particularly good algorithm |
03 | Programs that are particularly well written or use the capabilities of the language particularly well |