You can't just add any formula as an axiom or definition and expect the logic
to stay sound! For example, if we were permitted to define (APP X Y)
so
that it was equal to (NOT (APP X Y))
then we could prove anything. The
purported ``definition'' of APP
must have several properties to be
admitted to the logic as a new axiom.
The key property a recursive definition must have is that the recursion terminate. This, along with some syntactic criteria, ensures us that there exists a function satisfying the definition.
Termination must be proved before the definition is admitted. This is done in general by finding a measure of the arguments of the function and a well-founded relation such that the arguments ``get smaller'' every time a recursive branch is taken.
For app
the measure is the ``size'' of the first argument, x
, as
determined by the primitive function acl2-count
. The
well-founded relation used in this example is o-p
, which is the
standard ordering on the ordinals less than ``epsilon naught.'' These
particular choices for app
were made ``automatically'' by ACL2. But they
are in fact determined by various ``default'' settings. The user of ACL2 can
change the defaults or specify a ``hint'' to the defun
command
to specify the measure and relation.
You should now return to the Walking Tour.