• Classified by Topic • Classified by Publication Type • Sorted by Date • Sorted by First Author Last Name • Classified by Funding Source •
Intelligent Disobedience and AI Rebel Agents in Assistive Robotics.
Reuth
Mirsky and Peter Stone.
In ICSR workshop on Adaptive Social Interaction
and MOVement for assistive and rehabilitation robotics (ASIMOV), November 2021.
With the increasing integration of service robots into assistive technologies, there is a need to reason about the boundaries and scope of these robots' autonomy, such as when they should merely react to their environment, when they should make proactive decisions, and when they should override commands. In most existing research, the definition of a ``good'' assistive robot is one that is compliant with respect to the commands it is given. Two recent papers challenge this perspective, and describe scenarios where a system might choose to rebel against a command or disobey its handler due to a deep understanding of the handler's intentions. This paper provides a comparative discussion about these two papers and how they together create a more comprehensive framework for assistive robots that can override commands.
@InProceedings{ASIMOV2021-REUTH,
author = {Reuth Mirsky and Peter Stone},
title = {Intelligent Disobedience and AI Rebel Agents in Assistive Robotics},
booktitle = {ICSR workshop on Adaptive Social Interaction and MOVement for assistive and rehabilitation robotics (ASIMOV)},
location = {Virtual},
month = {November},
year = {2021},
abstract = {
With the increasing integration of service robots into assistive technologies,
there is a need to reason about the boundaries and scope of these robots'
autonomy, such as when they should merely react to their environment, when
they should make proactive decisions, and when they should override commands.
In most existing research, the definition of a ``good'' assistive robot is
one that is compliant with respect to the commands it is given. Two recent
papers challenge this perspective, and describe scenarios where a system
might choose to rebel against a command or disobey its handler due to a deep
understanding of the handler's intentions. This paper provides a comparative
discussion about these two papers and how they together create a more
comprehensive framework for assistive robots that can override commands.
},
}
Generated by bib2html.pl (written by Patrick Riley ) on Sun Nov 24, 2024 20:24:53